Rugby training should be physical at times, and with that, the players must want to win contact situations. How do you create that atmosphere in a positive way in your sessions?
Scott “Razor” Robertson, the breakdancing Crusaders coach is a shrewd operator. As an uncompromising All Black back-rower, he knew how to win possession as a player. Now, as one of the premier club coaches in world rugby, he also knows a thing or two about keeping his players fit for the whole season.
One of his mantras is that you must save your ammo for the weekend. In other words, he doesn’t do much contact training during the week before a match. He does this for two reasons. First, it keeps his players fit – less bone-on-bone contact certainly reduces injuries. Second, it keeps the players hungry. Their contact ammunition hasn’t been used up in a Tuesday contact session.
I am sure he would be the first to admit that he uses this with a professional and well-motivated team that would happily knock seven bells out of each other during the week. With another team, and more probably the sorts of teams most of us coach, it’s a lot different. They need to spend time “fighting” and learning how to operate in more physical situations.
In my days of playing a good level of rugby, a Tuesday session after a defeat was often very physical. And, even for a winger like me, extremely enjoyable. I’m not sure how much skill was involved, but there was certainly plenty of frustration vented. It wasn’t unusual for the hookers to end up having a scuffle. Why is it always the hookers?!
A fight is a good way to think about the contest, though I would be careful to keep that language to yourself. Instead, create an environment where the players are keen to win contests, which then pushes them to use the right skills to overcome their opponent.
It’s a fight because, often, the initial contact skill doesn’t land the decisive blow. It might gain the advantage, yet it still needs to be finished. For example, at the ruck, a defender might get their hands on the ball. They need to be strong and sturdy so they aren’t driven off. Or, a tackler makes a good shoulder contact with the ball carrier. Continuing to drive their legs, tightening the grip and twisting in the finish gives the rest of the team a chance to turn over the ball.
The same is true when the situation is not so positive. Continued resilience can reduce the outcomes for the opposition and sometimes even reverse the outcome in the favour of the better “fighter”.
Instil this attitude in sessions likestopping defences spoiling the ball. The session and techniques are not all about “blood and guts”, but do help reveal resilience.
Training should be physical, and players must want to win contact situations.
Scott “Razor” Robertson, the Crusaders coach, saves full-on contact for the weekend games to keep his players fit and hungry.
So, while professional and well-motivated teams can do without full-on contact training during the week, other teams need to spend time “fighting” and learning how to operate in physical situations.
At the breakdown, many defensive teams concentrate a great deal of effort on scanning then spoiling the tackle area before the attacking half-back gets his hands on the ball. Top-tier New Zealand sides use a simple but very effective method of sealing the tackle ball and giving their 9 a line of defence from the would-be spoilers. MORE
We have plenty of tag resources on this site, and I’m keen to ensure they can easily be upgraded into full sessions. Perhaps they won’t be doing much rucking, but there’s plenty else to learn from tag beginnings. MORE
Ian Diddams reviews the latest law directives around the ruck, and looks at how you might adjust your training sessions to help your players become more effective in this contact area. MORE
Upgrade your good tacklers by making them more aware of the type of tackles which would prevent offloads or create opportunities for turnovers. That will make them defenders not just tacklers. MORE
How far should you go in developing better evasion skills by setting up footwork exercises without defenders? Is it better to let them play and discover? MORE
In essence, I wanted to create defensive games which would force attacking teams to realign with more depth. The rewards were aimed squarely at the defence. If they were successful, they would either gain the ball, or in the case of the overloaded game (where there were more attackers than defenders), they would move over into the attacking team. MORE